Girl-s

IRPS

Home
Classrooms
Curriculum
Information
MECP
Parents
School Programs
SWT I
Specialists
Special Services
Staff
Welcome
Happenings
Just for Kids
Snow
Translate
Good News

Revised 3/4/2008

Reading Action Plan 2007-2008

(one form for each goal)

1. School Improvement Goal:  READING – Comprehension – Improve inferential and evaluative comprehension.

Rationale:

Activities:
Steps to be taken.
What will occur?

Who is Responsible?
Who is involved?
Who will provide the leadership?  Who will do the work?

Timeline:
When will this strategy or action begin and end?

Resources Needed:
What existing and new resources will be used to accomplish the strategy?

Expected Impact:
What measurable change will be seen?

Monitoring Effectiveness:
For each activity, what formative evidence will be gathered to demonstrate progress? 

Monitor K-3rd grade comprehension skills through exposure and practice.

 

  • Grade Level Teachers
  • Principal
  • Curriculum Director

 

Weekly

 

Monthly
Monthly


Every 7 weeks

3 times a year

Annually
4 times a year

Weekly

A minimum of every 10 school days

 

 

  • OC comprehension strategy materials.
  • Reading rubrics
  • Uniform data spread sheet formatted by grade level
  • OC end of unit assessment
  • MAP (2nd & 3rd grade)
  • WASL
  • SWT Fluency Screenings
  • Accelerated Reader (STAR).
  • Pertinent articles and intervention strategies.

 

Movement toward meeting standard (80% or better)

 

 

STAR

Skills Grouping

Each trimester review:

  • 2nd-3rd grade STAR
  • Classroom based assessment
  • Open Court Reading (OCR) assessments
  • MAP (2nd and 3rd grade)
  • WASL
  • Reading Wedge

Activities:
Steps to be taken.
What will occur?

Who is Responsible?
Who is involved?
Who will provide the leadership?  Who will do the work?

Timeline:
When will this strategy or action begin and end?

Resources Needed:
What existing and new resources will be used to accomplish the strategy?

Expected Impact:
What measurable change will be seen?

Monitoring Effectiveness:
For each activity, what formative evidence will be gathered to demonstrate progress? 

Provide targeted instruction for students not attaining standard

 


Review formative data

  • Grade level teachers
  • Principal
  • Curriculum Director


     
  • Grade level teachers
  • Principal
  • Curriculum Director

2-3 weeks with fidelity


 



Each
trimester

 

Pertinent articles and intervention strategies.

 


 

  • STAR
  • Classroom Based Assessment
  • Open Court Reading (OCR) assessments
  • MAP (2nd and 3rd grade)
  • SWT screenings

Reduce percentage of students in Tiers II and III (Washington State Reading Instructional Model – wedge).

Reduce percentage of students in Tiers II and III (Washington State Reading Instructional Model – wedge)
.

  • Curriculum based assessments

 

 

 

  • STAR
  • Classroom Based Assessment
  • Open Court Reading (OCR) assessments
  • MAP (2nd and 3rd grade)
  • SWT screenings

Accelerated Reader implemented 2nd-3rd grades and some 1st grades in January.

 

  • Librarian
  • Classroom teachers
  • COMPASS staff

 

2007-2008

2nd & 3rd Gr. - 3 times minimum per year

1st Gr. –When a student reaches a .5 reading level, they will participate in the AR program.

  • STAR test
  • Readability  guidelines
  • Leveled books
  • Tests
  • Computers
  • Technical support
  • Train future librarian and teachers in Accelerated Reader

 

Improved comprehension. (ZPD)

All 2nd and 3rd grade students will be reading in their Zone of Proximinal Development (ZPD – reading level range).

 

  • Student Performance
    (ZPD growth)
  • TOPS test (instant read out of individual book test for reading practice)

 

Administer STAR test to 2nd – 3rd grades to determine instructional strategies.

 

  • Classroom teachers
  • Librarian
  • Principal

2007-2008
September, January, and June

 

  • STAR tests
  • Computers
  • Train future librarian in STAR administration
  • Train teachers

STAR Program analysis of individual/progress using end of the year data to determine growth in student achievement.

STAR Diagnostic Report and Reading Growth Report results September, January, and June

Use of WASL like comprehension question for identified stories.

  • K-1 oral
  • Grade 2 ~ Oral leading to written
  • Grade 3 ~ Written

 

 

Grade 3 ~ Glenn

Ongoing 2007-2008

 

  • Open Court books
  • Released WASL items

 

Grades 1-3
75% meet standard on Reading WASL

Reduce percentage of students in Tiers II and III (Washington State Reading Instructional Model – wedge).

 

Student performance based on grade level rubric for WASL like questions.

Activities:
Steps to be taken.
What will occur?

Who is Responsible?
Who is involved?
Who will provide the leadership?  Who will do the work?

Timeline:
When will this strategy or action begin and end?

Resources Needed:
What existing and new resources will be used to accomplish the strategy?

Expected Impact:
What measurable change will be seen?

Monitoring Effectiveness:
For each activity, what formative evidence will be gathered to demonstrate progress? 

Continuation of fluency screenings in K-3rd grades.

 

  • All classroom teachers
  • SWT staff

 

  • September
  • November
  • March
  • May

 

SWT screening materials

DRA materials
Established sub support for DRA

80% of students will meet or exceed grade level standard for words per minute.

  • K-3rd SWT screening
  • 2nd DRA

 

Oral reading one-on-one.

 

  • Classroom teachers
  • Volunteers

 

Weekly
2007-2008

 

OCR

  • Decodables
  • Anthologies

 

Student will demonstrate growth over time.

 

  • Reading Wedge
  • SWT graphs
  • Teacher tracking documentation
  • Use of report card rubric

Flash card phrases to increase fluency.

Grade 1 sight words.

Classroom teachers

SWT Reading

 

Beginning of the year Fall 2007.

 

  • Fry phrases
  • Dolch phrases

Increased oral reading fluency

  • 80% of students will be at or above grade level standard for fluency by June 2008

Compare/monitor student achievement each trimester using SWT data graphs.

Commitment by K-3rd grade classroom teachers to provide 90 minutes of OCR reading.

 

  • Principal
  • K-3rd grade level teachers

2007-2008

OCR

Reduce percentage of students in Tiers II and III (Washington State Reading Instructional Model – wedge).

Accountability monitoring/data

 

Procedures for Evaluating Progress Toward Goal:  Review results on Open Court assessments, WASL, MAP, and Accelerated Reader.

 

 

Action Plan Outline
(one form for each goal)

  • School Improvement Goal: Vocabulary – Understand and use of Tier I & II vocabulary words.

    Rationale:

Activities:
Steps to be taken.
What will occur?

Who is Responsible?
Who is involved?
Who will provide the leadership?  Who will do the work?

Timeline:
When will this strategy or action begin and end?

Resources Needed:
What existing and new resources will be used to accomplish the strategy?

Expected Impact:
What measurable change will be seen?

Monitoring Effectiveness:
For each activity, what formative evidence will be gathered to demonstrate progress?

Vocabulary words will be explicitly taught for meaning.

 

All staff

 

September 2007- June 2008

 

  • OCR materials
  • Tier I & II words from Reading Intervention Summit
  • WASL vocabulary lists

 

Students will include Tier II words across a variety of domains

  • Writing
  • Speaking

     

Vocabulary usage in oral and written expression activities, measured trimesterly using developed rubrics.

Procedures for Evaluating Progress Toward Goal:  Review results on Open Court Reading assessments, WASL, MAP, and Accelerated Reader.