1. School Improvement Goal: READING Comprehension Improve inferential and evaluative comprehension.
|
Activities: Steps to be taken. What will occur?
|
Who is Responsible? Who is involved? Who will provide the leadership? Who will do the work?
|
Timeline: When
will this strategy or action begin and end?
|
Resources Needed: What existing and new resources will be used to accomplish the strategy?
|
Expected Impact: What measurable change will be seen?
|
Monitoring Effectiveness: For each activity, what formative evidence will be gathered to demonstrate progress?
|
|
Monitor K-3rd grade comprehension skills through exposure and practice.
|
- Grade Level Teachers
- Principal
- Curriculum Director
|
Weekly
Monthly Monthly
Every 7 weeks
3 times a year
Annually 4 times a year
Weekly
A minimum of every 10 school days
|
- OC comprehension strategy materials.
- Reading rubrics
- Uniform data spread sheet formatted by grade level
- OC end of unit assessment
- MAP (2nd & 3rd grade)
- WASL
- SWT Fluency Screenings
- Accelerated Reader (STAR).
- Pertinent articles and intervention strategies.
|
Movement toward meeting standard (80% or better)
|
STAR
Skills Grouping
Each trimester review:
- 2nd-3rd grade STAR
- Classroom based assessment
- Open Court Reading (OCR) assessments
- MAP (2nd and 3rd grade)
- WASL
- Reading Wedge
|
|
Activities: Steps to be taken. What will occur?
|
Who is Responsible? Who is involved? Who will provide the leadership? Who will do the work?
|
Timeline: When
will this strategy or action begin and end?
|
Resources Needed: What existing and new resources will be used to accomplish the strategy?
|
Expected Impact: What measurable change will be seen?
|
Monitoring Effectiveness: For each activity, what formative evidence will be gathered to demonstrate progress?
|
|
Provide targeted instruction for students not attaining standard
Review formative data
|
- Grade level teachers
- Principal
- Curriculum Director
- Grade level teachers
- Principal
- Curriculum Director
|
2-3 weeks with fidelity
Each trimester
|
Pertinent articles and intervention strategies.
- STAR
- Classroom Based Assessment
- Open Court Reading (OCR) assessments
- MAP (2nd and 3rd grade)
- SWT screenings
|
Reduce percentage of students in Tiers II and III (Washington State Reading Instructional Model wedge).
Reduce percentage of students in Tiers II and III (Washington State Reading Instructional Model wedge).
|
- Curriculum based assessments
- STAR
- Classroom Based Assessment
- Open Court Reading (OCR) assessments
- MAP (2nd and 3rd grade)
- SWT screenings
|
|
Accelerated Reader implemented 2nd-3rd grades and some 1st grades in January.
|
- Librarian
- Classroom teachers
- COMPASS staff
|
2007-2008
2nd & 3rd Gr. - 3 times minimum per year
1st Gr. When a student reaches a .5 reading level, they will participate in the AR program.
|
- STAR test
- Readability guidelines
- Leveled books
- Tests
- Computers
- Technical support
- Train future librarian and teachers in Accelerated Reader
|
Improved comprehension. (ZPD)
All 2nd and 3rd grade students will be reading in their Zone of Proximinal Development (ZPD reading level range).
|
- Student Performance
(ZPD growth)
- TOPS test (instant read out of individual book test for reading practice)
|
|
Administer STAR test to 2nd 3rd grades to determine instructional strategies.
|
- Classroom teachers
- Librarian
- Principal
|
2007-2008 September, January, and June
|
- STAR tests
- Computers
- Train future librarian in STAR administration
- Train teachers
|
STAR Program analysis of individual/progress using end of the year data to determine growth in student
achievement.
|
STAR Diagnostic Report and Reading Growth Report results September, January, and June
|
|
Use of WASL like comprehension question for identified stories.
- K-1 oral
- Grade 2 ~ Oral leading to written
- Grade 3 ~ Written
|
Grade 3 ~ Glenn
|
Ongoing 2007-2008
|
- Open Court books
- Released WASL items
|
Grades 1-3 75% meet standard on Reading WASL
Reduce percentage of students in Tiers II and III (Washington State Reading Instructional Model wedge).
|
Student performance based on grade level rubric for WASL like questions.
|
|
Activities: Steps to be taken. What will occur?
|
Who is Responsible? Who is involved? Who will provide the leadership? Who will do the work?
|
Timeline: When
will this strategy or action begin and end?
|
Resources Needed: What existing and new resources will be used to accomplish the strategy?
|
Expected Impact: What measurable change will be seen?
|
Monitoring Effectiveness: For each activity, what formative evidence will be gathered to demonstrate progress?
|
|
Continuation of fluency screenings in K-3rd grades.
|
- All classroom teachers
- SWT staff
|
- September
- November
- March
- May
|
SWT screening materials
DRA materials Established sub support for DRA
|
80% of students will meet or exceed grade level standard for words per minute.
|
- K-3rd SWT screening
- 2nd DRA
|
|
Oral reading one-on-one.
|
- Classroom teachers
- Volunteers
|
Weekly 2007-2008
|
OCR
|
Student will demonstrate growth over time.
|
- Reading Wedge
- SWT graphs
- Teacher tracking documentation
- Use of report card rubric
|
|
Flash card phrases to increase fluency.
Grade 1 sight words.
|
Classroom teachers
SWT Reading
|
Beginning of the year Fall 2007.
|
- Fry phrases
- Dolch phrases
|
Increased oral reading fluency
- 80% of students will be at or above grade level standard for fluency by June 2008
|
Compare/monitor student achievement each trimester using SWT data graphs.
|
|
Commitment by K-3rd grade classroom teachers to provide 90 minutes of OCR reading.
|
- Principal
- K-3rd grade level teachers
|
2007-2008
|
OCR
|
Reduce percentage of students in Tiers II and III (Washington State Reading Instructional Model wedge).
|
Accountability monitoring/data
|
|
Procedures for Evaluating Progress Toward Goal: Review results on Open Court assessments, WASL, MAP, and Accelerated Reader.
|